Counter-terrorism

The threat posed by terrorism after 9/11 created conflict between public security and fundamental individual procedural rights.

How to solve this conflict?
Does a person accused of supporting terrorism has the equal procedural rights as any accused person?
The post 9/11 world has seen increased recourse to procedures that modify the traditional and typical hearing process.
Is this a good direction?
How to counteract terrorism?
Does counter-terrorism justify reducing the right to privacy or freedom of expression?

All these questions will be the subject of the debate during the course.